Sponsor

Cleaning Industry Research Institute

 

Related TopicsShareLocal Guides
  Search Local Help & Info
What:  
Where:
  Browse by state
 » All Local Guides
 » Alabama
 » Alaska
 » Arizona
 » Arkansas
 » California
 » Colorado
 » Connecticut
 » DC
 » Delaware
 » Florida
 » Georgia
 » Hawaii
 » Idaho
 » Illinois
 » Indiana
 » Iowa
 » Kansas
 » Kentucky
 » Louisiana
 » Maine
 » Maryland
 » Massachusetts
 » Michigan
 » Minnesota
 » Mississippi
 » Missouri
 » Montana
 » Nebraska
 » Nevada
 » New Hampshire
 » New Jersey
 » New Mexico
 » New York
 » North Carolina
 » North Dakota
 » Ohio
 » Oklahoma
 » Oregon
 » Pennsylvania
 » Rhode Island
 » South Carolina
 » South Dakota
 » Tennessee
 » Texas
 » Utah
 » Vermont
 » Virginia
 » Washington
 » West Virginia
 » Wisconsin
 » Wyoming
SectionsTopics

Sponsor

Committed to Cleaning for Health - More efficient at removing pollutants from air - Four Level Filtration for Healthier Environments
Partners

Ads, ad links, products and content on this page are not necessarily endorsed by these organizations.

  • American School & University Logo
  • CRI_SOA_Logo_2c
  • CleanLink Logo
  • CMI-blue-logo
  • The Clean Trust-Logo
  • We-Support-Cleaning-Industry-Research-Institute-CIRI-Large
  • College Planning & Management
  • Executive Housekeeping Today
  • International Custodial Advisors Network
  • ICS logo
  • IEHA
  • ISSA-CIMS-logo
  • ISSA logo
  • Facility Care logo
  • McMorrow Report
  • National Floor Safety Institute
  • Process Cleaning for Healthy Schools
  • School Planning & Management
Advisory Board
  • Gary Allread Ph.D.
  • Stephen P. Ashkin
  • Anila Bello ScD
  • Holly Brown-Williams
  • Kumkum M. Dilwali MS, LEED-AP
  • Edward A. Emmett MD, MS
  • Peter Ermish
  • Dennis Fetzer
  • John Gayetsky
  • Charles P. Gerba Ph.D.
  • Jay Glasel Ph.D.
  • Jessica Green Ph.D.
  • Kristin Pederson Gulrud Ph.D.
  • Russell J. Kendzior
  • Jason Marshall ScD
  • Rex Morrison
  • David Mudarri Ph.D.
  • Robert W. Powitz Ph.D., M.P.H, R.S., D.L.A.A.S.
  • Rich Prill
  • Margaret M. Quinn ScD, CIH
  • Beth B. Risinger
  • Richard J. Shaughnessy Ph.D.
  • Craig Slatin Sc.D., MPH
  • Carl Solomon Sr.
  • Barbara M. Soule R.N., M.P.A., C.I.C.
  • Anne C. Steinemann Ph.D.
  • Andrew J. Streifel
  • Benjamin D. Tanner Ph.D.
  • Dr. Philip Tierno, Jr.
  • Charles D. (Chuck) Treser MPH, DAAS
  • Daniel Wagner
  • Laura Wenger RN

More than 12% of Population Reports Extreme Sensitivity to Low Levels of Common Chemicals

Approximately 12.6% of the population suffers from multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS), a condition in which they experience reactions from exposure to low concentrations of common chemicals, according to a study published in the September 2003 issue of the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP). Of those reporting such hypersensitivity, 13.5% (or 1.8% of the entire sample) reported losing their jobs because of it. Extrapolated to a [2003] U.S. population of 290 million, the study means as many as 36.5 million Americans are suffering from MCS, and more than 5.2 million may lose jobs as a result.

MCS is a condition in which individuals have an acute hypersensitivity to the chemicals in everyday substances, including household cleaning agents, pesticides, fresh paint, new carpeting, building materials, newsprint, perfume, and numerous other petrochemical-based products. Individuals with MCS may experience headaches, burning eyes, asthma symptoms, stomach distress/nausea, dizziness, loss of mental concentration, and muscle pain. Some individuals also suffer fever or even loss of consciousness.

 

Participants of the study, all residents of metropolitan Atlanta, were surveyed at random. Those who reported MCS were later interviewed in more detail to understand how the syndrome affects their daily lives.

“MCS can produce a wide range of symptoms, and individuals with hypersensitivity can encounter great difficulty functioning in normal working and living environments,” the study authors wrote.

MCS is often triggered, or initiated, by an acute one-time exposure to a specific toxic agent, or chronic exposure to one or more toxic substances, even at low levels. After initiation, a wider range of substances can cause subsequent reactions.

A second study in the same issue of EHP discussed how MCS patients responded to various treatments. Patients responded best to having a relatively chemical-free living space, avoiding chemical exposures, and prayer. Certain treatments, including use of common antidepressants, were rated more likely to harm than help.

 

Commenting on the study, Dr. Jim Burkhart, science editor for EHP, said, “There are clearly large numbers of people suffering from MCS. At one point, people theorized that this condition might have a psychological basis, but this study also indicates that very few patients had any mental illness prior to MCS. Unfortunately, over 37% reported emotional problems after their physical symptoms emerged. This is a significant public health issue.”

 

The prevalence study was conducted by Stanley M. Caress of the State University of West Georgia and Anne C. Steinemann of the Georgia Institute of Technology. The study on treatment efficacy was conducted by Pamela Reed Gibson, Amy Nicole-Marie Elms, and Lisa Ann Ruding of James Madison University.

More than 12% of Population Reports Extreme Sensitivity to Low Levels of Common Chemicals

Created on February 25th, 2011.  Last Modified on February 11th, 2012

The Healthy Facilities Institute provides the information on HealthyFaciltiesInstitute.com as a free service to the public.

 

While an effort is made to ensure the quality of the content and credibility of sources listed on this site, HFI provides no warranty - expressed or implied - and assumes no legal liability for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed on or in conjunction with the site. The views and opinions of the authors or originators expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of HFI: its principals, executives, board members, advisors or affiliates.

Other Articles by Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP)

All articles by this author →

About Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP)

Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly journal of peer-reviewed research and news published by the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services. EHP's mission is to serve as a forum for the discussion of the interrelationships between the environment and human health by publishing in a balanced and objective manner the best peer-reviewed research and most current and credible news of the field. With an impact factor of 6.19, EHP is the top monthly journal in public, environmental, and occupational health and the second-ranked monthly journal in environmental sciences.

The environmental health sciences include many fields of study and increasingly comprise a multidisciplinary research area. EHP publishes articles from a wide range of scientific disciplines encompassing basic research; epidemiologic studies; risk assessment; relevant ethical, legal, social, environmental justice, and policy topics; longitudinal human studies; in vitro and in vivo animal research with a clear relationship to human health; and environmental medicine case reports. Because children are uniquely sensitive to their environments, EHP devotes a research section specifically to issues surrounding children's environmental health.

 
 
 
 

© 2010 - 2012 Healthy Facilities Institute®
All Rights Reserved
News / About / Contact Us

Disclaimer

The Healthy Facilities Institute provides the information on HealthyFaciltiesInstitute.com as a free service to the public.

 

BESTWhile an effort is made to ensure the quality of the content and credibility of sources listed on this site, HFI provides no warranty - expressed or implied - and assumes no legal liability for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed on or in conjunction with the site. The views and opinions of the authors or originators expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of HFI: its principals, executives, board members, advisors or affiliates.

Sitemap